<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://dotnetmarche.org/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>ExternalBlogs : OOXML</title><link>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/OOXML/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: OOXML</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>Piccola sorpresa di Sun per OOXML</title><link>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2010/04/20/piccola-sorpresa-di-sun-per-ooxml.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:16:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">61321887-5500-4417-8b9e-633d632ef265:5945</guid><dc:creator>nonaka</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=5945</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2010/04/20/piccola-sorpresa-di-sun-per-ooxml.aspx#comments</comments><description>Sun ha deciso di far pagare 90 dollari il plug-in per OOXML&amp;#160; disponibile per OpenOffice fino a poco tempo in maniera gratuita. Non capisco questa strategia, mi limito a dire che sia fatideosissima.
The plug-in was never open source. It was just free...(&lt;a href="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2010/04/20/piccola-sorpresa-di-sun-per-ooxml.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://dotnetmarche.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5945" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/ODF/default.aspx">ODF</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/OOXML/default.aspx">OOXML</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Technology/default.aspx">Technology</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/OpenOffice/default.aspx">OpenOffice</category></item><item><title>ISO/JTC1 SC34/WG4 Public Mailinglist</title><link>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/11/05/iso-jtc1-sc34-wg4-public-mailinglist.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 08:46:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">61321887-5500-4417-8b9e-633d632ef265:5751</guid><dc:creator>nonaka</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=5751</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/11/05/iso-jtc1-sc34-wg4-public-mailinglist.aspx#comments</comments><description>Da oggi la mailinglist del WG4 è pubblica, potete sottoscrivere il vostro account di posta elettronica e seguire le discussioni in merito al processo di manutenzione di ISO 29500....(&lt;a href="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/11/05/iso-jtc1-sc34-wg4-public-mailinglist.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://dotnetmarche.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5751" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/OOXML/default.aspx">OOXML</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/ISO/default.aspx">ISO</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Featured/default.aspx">Featured</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Management/default.aspx">Management</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Technology/default.aspx">Technology</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/ISO+29500/default.aspx">ISO 29500</category></item><item><title>SharePoint Conference: My personal Agenda</title><link>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/10/13/sharepoint-conference-my-personal-agenda.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:01:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">61321887-5500-4417-8b9e-633d632ef265:5670</guid><dc:creator>nonaka</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=5670</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/10/13/sharepoint-conference-my-personal-agenda.aspx#comments</comments><description>Da oggi, tutti gli iscritti alla Microsoft SharePoint Conference hanno la possibilità di utilizzare l’opzione MySPC, che permette la schedulazione del calendario delle sessioni di maggiore interesse per i partecipanti. A differenza dello scorso anno,...(&lt;a href="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/10/13/sharepoint-conference-my-personal-agenda.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://dotnetmarche.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5670" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Sharepoint/default.aspx">Sharepoint</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Personal/default.aspx">Personal</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Office/default.aspx">Office</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/OOXML/default.aspx">OOXML</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/SharePoint+Conference/default.aspx">SharePoint Conference</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Headline/default.aspx">Headline</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Featured/default.aspx">Featured</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Technology/default.aspx">Technology</category></item><item><title>Office OpenXML – Transitional Vs Strict</title><link>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/10/06/office-openxml-transitional-vs-strict.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 09:55:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">61321887-5500-4417-8b9e-633d632ef265:5646</guid><dc:creator>nonaka</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=5646</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/10/06/office-openxml-transitional-vs-strict.aspx#comments</comments><description>Uno dei chiarimenti più importanti che sono frutto dell’ultima riunione di Seattle, da parte del JTC1/SC34 WG4 sta proprio nella specificità della correlazione tra documenti che basano la loro definizione su schemi transitional e strict. Dalla nascità...(&lt;a href="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/10/06/office-openxml-transitional-vs-strict.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://dotnetmarche.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5646" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Office/default.aspx">Office</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/OOXML/default.aspx">OOXML</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/ISO/default.aspx">ISO</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Technology/default.aspx">Technology</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/ISO+29500/default.aspx">ISO 29500</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/people+as+middleware/default.aspx">people as middleware</category></item><item><title>Open XML ISO 29500 ultimi ma importanti Defect reports</title><link>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/09/10/open-xml-iso-29500-ultimi-ma-importanti-defect-reports.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:26:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">61321887-5500-4417-8b9e-633d632ef265:5572</guid><dc:creator>nonaka</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=5572</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/09/10/open-xml-iso-29500-ultimi-ma-importanti-defect-reports.aspx#comments</comments><description>Torno ora da una conf-call organizzata da UNINFO (JTC/1 SC34) per discutere circa la posizione di voto dell’Italia nei confronti di alcuni Defect Reports che riguardano ISO 29500 (OOXML per intenderci). Sono mesi oramai che si discute, più o meno animatamente...(&lt;a href="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/09/10/open-xml-iso-29500-ultimi-ma-importanti-defect-reports.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://dotnetmarche.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5572" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/OOXML/default.aspx">OOXML</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/ISO/default.aspx">ISO</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Headline/default.aspx">Headline</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Management/default.aspx">Management</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Technology/default.aspx">Technology</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/ISO+29500/default.aspx">ISO 29500</category></item><item><title>Open XML Format SDK 2.0: best practice</title><link>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/05/15/open-xml-format-sdk-2-0-best-practice.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 01:32:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">61321887-5500-4417-8b9e-633d632ef265:5269</guid><dc:creator>nonaka</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=5269</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/05/15/open-xml-format-sdk-2-0-best-practice.aspx#comments</comments><description>Erika nel suo blog, propone una serie completa di best practice utilizzando la nuova SDK disponibile al download qui.
Molto importante e utile il tool incluso nella SDK, Document Reflector, che permette la navigazione della struttura del documento contemporaneamente...(&lt;a href="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/05/15/open-xml-format-sdk-2-0-best-practice.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://dotnetmarche.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5269" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Personal/default.aspx">Personal</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/OOXML/default.aspx">OOXML</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/MSDN/default.aspx">MSDN</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Headline/default.aspx">Headline</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Technology/default.aspx">Technology</category></item><item><title>Microsoft Office SharePoint Server SP2</title><link>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/04/29/microsoft-office-sharepoint-server-sp2.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:01:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">61321887-5500-4417-8b9e-633d632ef265:5202</guid><dc:creator>nonaka</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=5202</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/04/29/microsoft-office-sharepoint-server-sp2.aspx#comments</comments><description>Post *di servizio* per segnalarvi l’uscita della SP2 per MOSS/WSS. L’aggiornamento di SharePoint alla SP2 è molto importante per chi volesse trovarsi in vantaggio per l’upgrade alla prossima versione di MOSS (2010). Qui trovate la lista completa di fixed...(&lt;a href="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/04/29/microsoft-office-sharepoint-server-sp2.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://dotnetmarche.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5202" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Sharepoint/default.aspx">Sharepoint</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/MOSS/default.aspx">MOSS</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Office/default.aspx">Office</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/ODF/default.aspx">ODF</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/OOXML/default.aspx">OOXML</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Featured/default.aspx">Featured</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Technology/default.aspx">Technology</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/OpenOffice/default.aspx">OpenOffice</category></item><item><title>Novità importanti per OOXML – IS29500</title><link>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/04/20/novit-224-importanti-per-ooxml-is29500.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 08:05:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">61321887-5500-4417-8b9e-633d632ef265:5179</guid><dc:creator>nonaka</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=5179</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/04/20/novit-224-importanti-per-ooxml-is29500.aspx#comments</comments><description>Andrea parla dell’accetazione di IS 29500 da parte di INCITS, intanto anche nel WG4 si stanno dibattendo importanti discussioni circa le specifiche del nuovo OOXML, eccovene alcune pubbliche: Losing data the silent way - ISO8601-dates
Versioning of OOXML...(&lt;a href="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/04/20/novit-224-importanti-per-ooxml-is29500.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://dotnetmarche.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5179" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/OOXML/default.aspx">OOXML</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Headline/default.aspx">Headline</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Featured/default.aspx">Featured</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Technology/default.aspx">Technology</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/ISO+29500/default.aspx">ISO 29500</category></item><item><title>IS 29500 Validator and Document-Library</title><link>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/03/19/is-29500-validator-and-document-library.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 02:27:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">61321887-5500-4417-8b9e-633d632ef265:5020</guid><dc:creator>nonaka</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=5020</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/03/19/is-29500-validator-and-document-library.aspx#comments</comments><description>Microsoft e l’istituto tedesco Fraunhofer (Institute for Open Communication System) annunciano una collaborazione per la realizzazione di un validatore di documenti ISO/IEC 29500 frutto di una open library contenente best practices. Dough Mahugh è coinvolto...(&lt;a href="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/03/19/is-29500-validator-and-document-library.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://dotnetmarche.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5020" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Microsoft/default.aspx">Microsoft</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/OOXML/default.aspx">OOXML</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Featured/default.aspx">Featured</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Society/default.aspx">Society</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Technology/default.aspx">Technology</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/IT/default.aspx">IT</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/ISO+29500/default.aspx">ISO 29500</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Standard/default.aspx">Standard</category></item><item><title>Armonizzare i nuovi formati documentali</title><link>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/01/20/armonizzare-i-nuovi-formati-documentali.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:49:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">61321887-5500-4417-8b9e-633d632ef265:4726</guid><dc:creator>nonaka</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=4726</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/01/20/armonizzare-i-nuovi-formati-documentali.aspx#comments</comments><description>Sono tornato da poco dalla riunione del gruppo di lavoro italiano afferente al SC34/WG5 dedicato alla discussione su di una possibile implementazione di mappature funzionali da e per ISO 29500 (Office Open XML), ISO 26300:2006 (Open Document Format)....(&lt;a href="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/01/20/armonizzare-i-nuovi-formati-documentali.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://dotnetmarche.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4726" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Research/default.aspx">Research</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/ODF/default.aspx">ODF</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/OOXML/default.aspx">OOXML</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/UNINFO/default.aspx">UNINFO</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/OASIS/default.aspx">OASIS</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Headline/default.aspx">Headline</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Management/default.aspx">Management</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Technology/default.aspx">Technology</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/ISO+29500/default.aspx">ISO 29500</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/WG5/default.aspx">WG5</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/ISO+26300_3A00_2006/default.aspx">ISO 26300:2006</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Standard/default.aspx">Standard</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/SC34/default.aspx">SC34</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Open+office/default.aspx">Open office</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/ISO+26300/default.aspx">ISO 26300</category></item><item><title>What the final standard is going to be?</title><link>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2007/10/30/what-the-final-standard-is-going-to-be.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:26:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">61321887-5500-4417-8b9e-633d632ef265:3028</guid><dc:creator>Romeo Pruno</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=3028</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2007/10/30/what-the-final-standard-is-going-to-be.aspx#comments</comments><description>In questi giorni la rete freme di opinioni, molto interessanti, circa le attauali questioni suoi nuovi formati documentali. Da parte mia spero di fare in tempo a preparare un contributo interessante per il KBox di metà novembre . Invece leggendo e discutendo...(&lt;a href="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2007/10/30/what-the-final-standard-is-going-to-be.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://dotnetmarche.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3028" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/ISO-UNINFO/default.aspx">ISO-UNINFO</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Document+Management/default.aspx">Document Management</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Information+Technology/default.aspx">Information Technology</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/ECMA376/default.aspx">ECMA376</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/ODF/default.aspx">ODF</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/OOXML/default.aspx">OOXML</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/dis+29500/default.aspx">dis 29500</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/UNINFO/default.aspx">UNINFO</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/ISO/default.aspx">ISO</category></item><item><title>ODF infighting could help Microsoft's OOXML</title><link>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2007/10/30/odf-infighting-could-help-microsoft-s-ooxml.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:12:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">61321887-5500-4417-8b9e-633d632ef265:3029</guid><dc:creator>Romeo Pruno</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=3029</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2007/10/30/odf-infighting-could-help-microsoft-s-ooxml.aspx#comments</comments><description>An intesting article VIA ZDNet &amp;quot;...In answer to Mary Jo&amp;#39;s question whether disarray in the ODF community will result in OOXML being approved by ISO, splintering over which standard to support does not mean the opposition to OOXML is splintering...(&lt;a href="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2007/10/30/odf-infighting-could-help-microsoft-s-ooxml.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://dotnetmarche.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3029" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/ISO-UNINFO/default.aspx">ISO-UNINFO</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Document+Management/default.aspx">Document Management</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Information+Technology/default.aspx">Information Technology</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/ECMA376/default.aspx">ECMA376</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/ODF/default.aspx">ODF</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/OOXML/default.aspx">OOXML</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/ISO/default.aspx">ISO</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/OASIS/default.aspx">OASIS</category></item><item><title>The Open Doucment Foundation has quietly ended its DaVinci project</title><link>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2007/10/28/the-open-doucment-foundation-has-quietly-ended-its-davinci-project.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 14:02:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">61321887-5500-4417-8b9e-633d632ef265:3017</guid><dc:creator>Romeo Pruno</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=3017</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2007/10/28/the-open-doucment-foundation-has-quietly-ended-its-davinci-project.aspx#comments</comments><description>Thks to Massimo The Register &amp;quot;The Open Document Foundation (ODF) has quietly ended all work on its da Vinci project after failing to secure approval from the Organisation for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS). The da Vinci...(&lt;a href="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2007/10/28/the-open-doucment-foundation-has-quietly-ended-its-davinci-project.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://dotnetmarche.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3017" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/ISO-UNINFO/default.aspx">ISO-UNINFO</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Information+Technology/default.aspx">Information Technology</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/ISO_2F00_IEC+26300/default.aspx">ISO/IEC 26300</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/ODF/default.aspx">ODF</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/OOXML/default.aspx">OOXML</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/ECMA+376/default.aspx">ECMA 376</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Open+Document+format/default.aspx">Open Document format</category></item><item><title>Uniform Office document Format converter</title><link>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2007/10/10/uniform-office-document-format-converter.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 09:15:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">61321887-5500-4417-8b9e-633d632ef265:2896</guid><dc:creator>Romeo Pruno</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=2896</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2007/10/10/uniform-office-document-format-converter.aspx#comments</comments><description>Dopo l&amp;#39;annuncio di Microsoft verso l&amp;#39;impegno di sostenere a breve la conversione di formati di files da ECMA376 ad UOF ancora ad oggi su SourceForge ci sono pochi progetti oltre quello di MS intenti a fare la stessa cosa con ISO/IEC 26300 , ecco...(&lt;a href="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2007/10/10/uniform-office-document-format-converter.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://dotnetmarche.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2896" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Research/default.aspx">Research</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/ISO-UNINFO/default.aspx">ISO-UNINFO</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Document+Management/default.aspx">Document Management</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Information+Technology/default.aspx">Information Technology</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/ECMA376/default.aspx">ECMA376</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/ISO_2F00_IEC+26300/default.aspx">ISO/IEC 26300</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/ODF/default.aspx">ODF</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/OOXML/default.aspx">OOXML</category></item><item><title>Microsoft and OpenSource</title><link>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2007/07/27/microsoft-and-opensource.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 09:17:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">61321887-5500-4417-8b9e-633d632ef265:2477</guid><dc:creator>Romeo Pruno</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=2477</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2007/07/27/microsoft-and-opensource.aspx#comments</comments><description>Leggo adesso da Vincenzo dell&amp;#39;ultima iniziativa di Microsoft verso il mondo OpenSource . La cosa che mi fa piacere legeere è che non si tratta di una semplice iniziativa per convincere i più ma un passo verso la condivisione di ciò che percepisce...(&lt;a href="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2007/07/27/microsoft-and-opensource.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://dotnetmarche.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2477" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Events/default.aspx">Events</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Information+Technology/default.aspx">Information Technology</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Microsoft/default.aspx">Microsoft</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/OOXML/default.aspx">OOXML</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/ECMA+376/default.aspx">ECMA 376</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Public+Sector/default.aspx">Public Sector</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/OpenSource/default.aspx">OpenSource</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Open+Specification+promise/default.aspx">Open Specification promise</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Interoperability/default.aspx">Interoperability</category></item></channel></rss>