<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://dotnetmarche.org/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>ExternalBlogs : Experiences</title><link>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Experiences/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: Experiences</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>Speedup Visual Studio with faster disk</title><link>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/08/31/speedup-visual-studio-with-faster-disk.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 05:16:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">61321887-5500-4417-8b9e-633d632ef265:5535</guid><dc:creator>Alkampfer's Place</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=5535</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/08/31/speedup-visual-studio-with-faster-disk.aspx#comments</comments><description>We always know that to speedup visual studio a fast disk is quite always a good choice, but what is best configuration?
I’ve done some little benchmark on the compilation of a project with a msbuild script and here is the result.
When all sources are...(&lt;a href="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/08/31/speedup-visual-studio-with-faster-disk.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://dotnetmarche.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5535" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/General/default.aspx">General</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Experiences/default.aspx">Experiences</category></item><item><title>Power of virtualization</title><link>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/08/28/power-of-virtualization.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 07:53:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">61321887-5500-4417-8b9e-633d632ef265:5532</guid><dc:creator>Alkampfer's Place</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=5532</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/08/28/power-of-virtualization.aspx#comments</comments><description>I really do not remember when was the first time I heard of VmWare,&amp;#160; I clearly remember that at those time I used both windows and Linux, and one day a friend of mine sent me a mail with an image showing Windows Maker desktop, with a windows inside...(&lt;a href="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/08/28/power-of-virtualization.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://dotnetmarche.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5532" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Experiences/default.aspx">Experiences</category></item><item><title>Good paper come back to use</title><link>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/08/02/good-paper-come-back-to-use.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 04:35:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">61321887-5500-4417-8b9e-633d632ef265:5478</guid><dc:creator>Alkampfer's Place</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=5478</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/08/02/good-paper-come-back-to-use.aspx#comments</comments><description>I’ve just read another good post of Jeff Atwood, that speak about PaperBack. I must admit that in 2009 it seems an oddity to claim for backup on paper, but it is an interesting and viable option to backup data. I must admit that I really love books, I...(&lt;a href="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/08/02/good-paper-come-back-to-use.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://dotnetmarche.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5478" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Experiences/default.aspx">Experiences</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Backup/default.aspx">Backup</category></item><item><title>Balsamiq mockup to the rescue</title><link>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/07/30/balsamiq-mockup-to-the-rescue.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:47:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">61321887-5500-4417-8b9e-633d632ef265:5472</guid><dc:creator>Alkampfer's Place</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=5472</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/07/30/balsamiq-mockup-to-the-rescue.aspx#comments</comments><description>Today I have to add some features to a wpf application and the interface was already quite cluttered with controls. Things are becoming messy, so I decided that I need to spent a little time restructuring the UI. I decided to use collapsible panels, but...(&lt;a href="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/07/30/balsamiq-mockup-to-the-rescue.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://dotnetmarche.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5472" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Experiences/default.aspx">Experiences</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Balsamiq+Mockup/default.aspx">Balsamiq Mockup</category></item><item><title>Thoughts on software engineering</title><link>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/07/28/thoughts-on-software-engineering.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:52:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">61321887-5500-4417-8b9e-633d632ef265:5469</guid><dc:creator>Alkampfer's Place</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=5469</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/07/28/thoughts-on-software-engineering.aspx#comments</comments><description>I was reading this post of Jeff Atwood that link this interesting article. One of the key point in the article was to consider two different kind of projects Project&amp;#160; A&amp;#160; will&amp;#160; eventually&amp;#160; cost&amp;#160; about&amp;#160; a&amp;#160; million dollars...(&lt;a href="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/07/28/thoughts-on-software-engineering.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://dotnetmarche.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5469" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Experiences/default.aspx">Experiences</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Programming/default.aspx">Programming</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Software+Engineering/default.aspx">Software Engineering</category></item><item><title>Publish a project with ClickOnce via NANT and CC.Net</title><link>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/06/18/publish-a-project-with-clickonce-via-nant-and-cc-net.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 06:47:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">61321887-5500-4417-8b9e-633d632ef265:5367</guid><dc:creator>Alkampfer's Place</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=5367</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/06/18/publish-a-project-with-clickonce-via-nant-and-cc-net.aspx#comments</comments><description>I have a project that needs to be published automatically through IIS directory, clickonce and CC.net machine. The easiest way to make this happens is to follow these simple instructions.
First of all goes into the machine where the CC.Net runs, prepare...(&lt;a href="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/06/18/publish-a-project-with-clickonce-via-nant-and-cc-net.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://dotnetmarche.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5367" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/.NET+framework/default.aspx">.NET framework</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Experiences/default.aspx">Experiences</category></item><item><title>Cannot create project in a newly installed TFS</title><link>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/06/15/cannot-create-project-in-a-newly-installed-tfs.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 10:27:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">61321887-5500-4417-8b9e-633d632ef265:5349</guid><dc:creator>Alkampfer's Place</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=5349</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/06/15/cannot-create-project-in-a-newly-installed-tfs.aspx#comments</comments><description>I’ve just installed Tfs For Workgroup in a small virtual machine to make some experiments. After setting up the machine (Windows 2008) I installed TFS SErvice pack 1 then tfs power toys and finally I opened up visual studio in my desktop machine. I simply...(&lt;a href="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/06/15/cannot-create-project-in-a-newly-installed-tfs.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://dotnetmarche.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5349" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/.NET+framework/default.aspx">.NET framework</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Experiences/default.aspx">Experiences</category></item><item><title>Error: the specified windows sharepoint services site url is not the default site collection site</title><link>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/06/12/error-the-specified-windows-sharepoint-services-site-url-is-not-the-default-site-collection-site.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:50:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">61321887-5500-4417-8b9e-633d632ef265:5339</guid><dc:creator>Alkampfer's Place</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=5339</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/06/12/error-the-specified-windows-sharepoint-services-site-url-is-not-the-default-site-collection-site.aspx#comments</comments><description>I’m installing Tfs 2008 on a Virtual machine. Following the guide I saw that I need first to install Share Point Services 3.0 SP2 before installing team foundation server. You can find those part in the guide with the title “How to: Install SharePoint...(&lt;a href="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/06/12/error-the-specified-windows-sharepoint-services-site-url-is-not-the-default-site-collection-site.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://dotnetmarche.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5339" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Experiences/default.aspx">Experiences</category></item><item><title>Do not forget Array</title><link>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/06/11/do-not-forget-array.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:01:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">61321887-5500-4417-8b9e-633d632ef265:5338</guid><dc:creator>Alkampfer's Place</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=5338</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/06/11/do-not-forget-array.aspx#comments</comments><description>I wrote a stupid util that does this operation: it scans a folder with 500.000 + files (in various subfolder), all files have name that contains an integer that is an id of a row in a database. I need to find orphan files, so I simply take file name,...(&lt;a href="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/06/11/do-not-forget-array.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://dotnetmarche.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5338" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/.NET+framework/default.aspx">.NET framework</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Experiences/default.aspx">Experiences</category></item><item><title>Going in production as often as you can</title><link>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/05/29/going-in-production-as-often-as-you-can.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 03:22:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">61321887-5500-4417-8b9e-633d632ef265:5307</guid><dc:creator>Alkampfer's Place</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=5307</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/05/29/going-in-production-as-often-as-you-can.aspx#comments</comments><description>I really care the concept of “going in production”, because it is the moment when the software bring to life. Going in production can be sometimes a really difficult thing to do, and there are a lot of reasons behind it.
First of all we have the syndrome...(&lt;a href="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/05/29/going-in-production-as-often-as-you-can.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://dotnetmarche.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5307" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Experiences/default.aspx">Experiences</category></item><item><title>Occam’s Razor, probably is the better principle to keep in mind</title><link>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/05/23/occam-s-razor-probably-is-the-better-principle-to-keep-in-mind.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 03:06:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">61321887-5500-4417-8b9e-633d632ef265:5292</guid><dc:creator>Alkampfer's Place</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=5292</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/05/23/occam-s-razor-probably-is-the-better-principle-to-keep-in-mind.aspx#comments</comments><description>This morning I completely wasted 2 hours of my life, here is the history.
I’m rewriting some nant script for a series of articles in italian language, this morning I did some modification to the base script, and I applied this new base script to a solution...(&lt;a href="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/05/23/occam-s-razor-probably-is-the-better-principle-to-keep-in-mind.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://dotnetmarche.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5292" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Experiences/default.aspx">Experiences</category></item><item><title>What university misses to taught</title><link>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/05/16/what-university-misses-to-taught.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 04:20:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">61321887-5500-4417-8b9e-633d632ef265:5277</guid><dc:creator>Alkampfer's Place</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=5277</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/05/16/what-university-misses-to-taught.aspx#comments</comments><description>Some time ago I had a discussion with a younger friend that goes to university. The argument of the discussion is “what university misses to taught”, this question arise because a lot of persons that comes out of university are not immediately productive...(&lt;a href="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/05/16/what-university-misses-to-taught.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://dotnetmarche.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5277" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Experiences/default.aspx">Experiences</category></item><item><title>Good programmers put code in production</title><link>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/05/09/good-programmers-put-code-in-production.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 04:08:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">61321887-5500-4417-8b9e-633d632ef265:5252</guid><dc:creator>Alkampfer's Place</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=5252</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/05/09/good-programmers-put-code-in-production.aspx#comments</comments><description>Some days ago I did a post that generates a lot of comments, it is called Java Versus .Net Programmers, and it made me think that there are a lot of ideas out of there on “what are the characteristics that makes a good programmer”
Most of the time I hear...(&lt;a href="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/05/09/good-programmers-put-code-in-production.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://dotnetmarche.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5252" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Experiences/default.aspx">Experiences</category></item><item><title>Web site VS Web application in .Net</title><link>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/05/04/web-site-vs-web-application-in-net.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 02:20:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">61321887-5500-4417-8b9e-633d632ef265:5219</guid><dc:creator>Alkampfer's Place</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=5219</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/05/04/web-site-vs-web-application-in-net.aspx#comments</comments><description>I had a big project that contains a big site written in asp.net webform and Visual Basic language. This site was created as “web site”, and when it became really big, it start being really really slooowwww..
To give some number, in my machine I usually...(&lt;a href="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2009/05/04/web-site-vs-web-application-in-net.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://dotnetmarche.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5219" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Experiences/default.aspx">Experiences</category></item><item><title>Faster invoke method of unknown objects with Expression tree part2</title><link>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2008/10/06/faster-invoke-method-of-unknown-objects-with-expression-tree-part2.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 09:51:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">61321887-5500-4417-8b9e-633d632ef265:4211</guid><dc:creator>Alkampfer's Place</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=4211</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2008/10/06/faster-invoke-method-of-unknown-objects-with-expression-tree-part2.aspx#comments</comments><description>In the last post I described a technique that uses Expression Tree to invoke dynamically methods of objects of types unknown at compile time. You can use this technique to build the ExpressionTreeReflection class.
You can now write code like this private...(&lt;a href="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/2008/10/06/faster-invoke-method-of-unknown-objects-with-expression-tree-part2.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://dotnetmarche.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4211" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/.NET+framework/default.aspx">.NET framework</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/LINQ/default.aspx">LINQ</category><category domain="http://dotnetmarche.org/blogs/externalblogs/archive/tags/Experiences/default.aspx">Experiences</category></item></channel></rss>